Re: Slow USB storage on A9 processors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-09-13 11:18, Mark Salter wrote:
>> On 2011-09-13 10:18, Mark Salter wrote:
>>> The big write performance hits are worrisome, though. I'd be good to
>>> test on one kernel version with and without the patch just to make sure.
>>> Also comparing SD performance with and without nosmp passed on cmdline
>>> would be interesting.
>
> I already have a good idea what the results will look like for usb, so
> just the other four with sd-card.


I tested 2.6.40.3 with and without the DMA API patch set, and with and 
without the nosmp cmdline option.

The good news: the DMA API patch set does not seem to be responsible for 
the slow-down in SD card performance, it was equally slow with all 
2.6.40.3 variants.  The bad news: some other change between 2.6.35 and 
2.6.40 must be responsible, so there's a lot of bisecting to do.

See the bonnie++ results at:
http://jeffbastian.blogspot.com/2011/09/sd-card-speeds.html

Jeff
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux