On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:53:05 +0100, Peter Robinson > <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> redhat-lsb 4.0 doesn't build on ARM. The problem is a compound one: >>> >>> 1) The PPC triggerfix patch causes __libc_start_main duplicate >>> definition. >>> Fixed redhat-lsb-triggerfix.patch is attached. >>> >>> 2) Also in triggerfix same patch, there are duplicate definitions >>> of: >>> __libc_csu_init >>> __libc_csu_fini >>> which seem to be just stubs in redhat_lsb_trigger.c. So I added an >>> ifndef >>> __arm__ around them. >>> >>> 3) The arm fix from lsb 3.x is still required (slightly modified, >>> attached) >>> >>> Is there a bugzilla ticket for this already raised? If so, can >>> somebody >>> provide a ticket number so I can put these patches there if it's not >>> already >>> fixed? >> >> Why don't you search in BZ against the component and if there isn't >> one report the bug and attach the patch? Its what the rest of us do, >> and it alerts the component maintain who is possibly not on this >> list. > > 1) I did and didn't find one - which is interesting since redhat-lsb > hasn't been available since F12 on ARM due to build failures. I thought > someone else here might be looking at the same issue. It has been discussed somewhere, possibly search the list archives. > 2) My interest is relatively narrow, and specific to the redhat-lsb > from RHEL6 release (4.0-3) since that is what I am porting to ARM. We > are not up to rawhide as far as releases go on ARM, and my general > perception is that filing bugs against Fedora is somewhat futile, > especially for secondary arches since it'll be EOL-ed and bugs > auto-closed before anybody ever looks at it - and we're not up to > rawhide yet on ARM. And it is extremely demotivating to have all your > bug tickets auto-closed with all the time-consuming work that went into > filing them just because the release is EOL-ed rather than because the > bugs are fixed or even looked into. So the goal posts move, and you have > to re-research and re-file the tickets - for a few months before the > goal posts move again. So I don't bother any more since there should be > people who care about it much more than I do. I find that a somewhat amusing and self defeating attitude. You come to the fedora arm list about a Redhat EL (presumably actually CentOS or similar) query, where if you file a bug against rawhide it will likely be included in the eventual RHEL-7 so you won't have the problem again but you complain about reporting bugs being a waste of time. Some might see anything to do with a non Fedora distro (even if its a derivative) posted to a Fedora list as a waste of their time..... so its swings and roundabouts. Peter > But since you asked, I have filed a bugzilla ticket: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738256 > > Gordan > _______________________________________________ > arm mailing list > arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm > _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
