Re: smsc95xx performance bug: eth vs usb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:59 PM, DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Or does it happen with reads too?
>
> With both the sata drive (sda) and flash drive (sdb) (both usb)
> connected, and network (also usb) up and running, I did some raw read
> tests:
>
> dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/null bs=4096 count=102400
> dd if=/dev/sdb1 of=/dev/null bs=4096 count=102400
>
> sda       Â9.4 ÂMB/sec
> sda+ping    Â23.4
>
> sdb       Â7.8
> sdb+ping    Â21.3
>
> both      Â14.7 each (29.4 total)
> both+ping    14.0 each (28.0 total)
>
> So, the problem seems to happen if you have one usb-storage active and
> no other usb activity, but other activity (either another usb-storage
> or ethernet pings) seems to work around the problem.

You also confirmed that one usb-storage and, quoting you:
> a serial port connected to a 9600 baud character generator,
> and got good performance.  Likewise with a usb mouse, as long as I
> wiggled the mouse during the test.

Were you referring to an onboard serial port ttyS or ttyO, or a ttyUSB?
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux