On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:16 PM, DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> In order to find out if the smsc95xx really is the cause, maybe you >> can do the same/similar test when the driver is not loaded? > > The ethernet is *on* the smsc9514 chip, as a USB device. ÂDisable > the hub, no ethernet. Uh, I think you understood my intention wrong. Obviously, the smsc9514 should provide usb0 as ethernet device as the smsc95xx module is a network driver. I was interested to find out if this USB-device is conflicting with the storage. Therefore you might be able to disable smsc95xx and see if your storage performs much better. When the storage is still not performing as it should, there is likely an issue with the USB-controller or the (assuming internal) USB-hub and not necessarily with the smsc95xx. Maybe it is clearer this way? _______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
