Re: smsc95xx performance bug: eth vs usb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Or does it happen with reads too?

With both the sata drive (sda) and flash drive (sdb) (both usb)
connected, and network (also usb) up and running, I did some raw read
tests:

dd if=/dev/sda1 of=/dev/null bs=4096 count=102400
dd if=/dev/sdb1 of=/dev/null bs=4096 count=102400

sda		 9.4  MB/sec
sda+ping	23.4

sdb		 7.8
sdb+ping	21.3

both		14.7 each (29.4 total)
both+ping	14.0 each (28.0 total)

So, the problem seems to happen if you have one usb-storage active and
no other usb activity, but other activity (either another usb-storage
or ethernet pings) seems to work around the problem.
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux