Re: Fat Binaries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Tyler <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 09:11 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> Okay, stupid question but again, why can't the static linker make the
>> changes to the in-core version of the library before it writes out the
>> resulting binary?  Actually, shouldn't the static linker write out a fat
>> binary?
>
> Because we're trying to do this with a wrapper, without any changes to
> the actual compiler or linker.

I guess this is just to bootstrap the build -- we're not trying to make
fat systems for installation?  So I guess it doesn't matter.  I'll shut
up now.

> -Chris

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord@xxxxxxx                        PGP key available
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux