Chris Tyler <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 08:15 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> Chris Tyler <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > Hi Nick,
>> >
>> > I haven't set up a testing configuration yet but this looks very much
>> > like what we need.
>> >
>> > Before each linking pass, will the script attempt to flip all the
>> > libraries to the 'current' API? (Thinking down the road, one
>> > ramification is that all of the libraries installed into the mock chroot
>> > will need to be writable by the mock user).
>>
>> Why can't the runtime linker make the change when it loads the
>> libraries? Why would it require changing the files on disk?
>
> Sorry, to clarify: I meant for static linking (and the fat binary
> approach is only to bootstrap an optimized armv7hl build).
Okay, stupid question but again, why can't the static linker make the
changes to the in-core version of the library before it writes out the
resulting binary? Actually, shouldn't the static linker write out a fat
binary?
> -Chris
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warlord@xxxxxxx PGP key available
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
