Re: Fat Binaries (was Re: arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 08:15 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Chris Tyler <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> > I haven't set up a testing configuration yet but this looks very much
> > like what we need.
> >
> > Before each linking pass, will the script attempt to flip all the
> > libraries to the 'current' API? (Thinking down the road, one
> > ramification is that all of the libraries installed into the mock chroot
> > will need to be writable by the mock user).
> 
> Why can't the runtime linker make the change when it loads the
> libraries?  Why would it require changing the files on disk?

Sorry, to clarify: I meant for static linking (and the fat binary
approach is only to bootstrap an optimized armv7hl build).

-Chris

_______________________________________________
arm mailing list
arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux