On 9/22/20 3:53 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Given that the proposal refers to the Code of Conduct and there is > currently a plan[1] to upgrade from a Code of Conduct to a Code of > Ethics, why are you rushing to do this Community Publishing Platforms > change in 2 weeks? > > Would the Fedora Council simply put this on hold until after the Code of > Ethics is final? Then there will be a better opportunity for the > community to discuss how the documents work together. Given that this policy change was first drafted and proposed in April, and since I labored on it in unpaid volunteer hours, this does not feel like "rushing" to me. (I actually wrote this before I joined the Fedora Council this year.) But I admit my bias as author. I agree with Marie's thinking to move forward with this policy, and if we need to make revisions later, we will. That's what we do in Fedora. Iterative learning. :) The feedback shared so far in the council-discuss thread does not convince me to hold up the process, although there are a few comments in the Pagure Pull Request that ask good questions. I will follow up there some time this week. -- Cheers, Justin W. Flory (he/him) https://jwf.io TZ=America/New_York
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
