Re: Modularity Fedora Objectives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Thanks for sharing this Martin. I have a few questions, comments, etc
below. I like the overall direction, so these should be read as
opportunities for improvement, not as criticism.

* When this was circulated on devel[1], some people raised concerns
that MBS isn't represented. Since that's going to be a key component
of this Objective's success, it would be good to have someone from
that team explicitly part of the Objective.
* Given that the F33 release is getting close, it's probably better to
focus on F34-35 (or 36 if you're looking at 18 months). Specifically,
it would be good to see at least some rough targets for the F35
release timeframe, with the understanding that a lot of the
research/planning work for that hasn't been done yet.
* For goal #4, do you have an idea of what the architectural changes
are or what you want to accomplish with them?
* Generally speaking, 12-18 months from now, how will we know if this
Objective has been successful? Number of modules available? Improved
maintainer sentiment? Improved user sentiment? Something else?


Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
Red Hat
council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines:
List Archives:

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux