Re: what is innuendo?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 27/03/2020 20:29, James Cassell wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> Innuendo is a veiled or equivocal attack on character or reputation. This
>> isn’t respectful discourse and is not okay as a member of the Fedora
>> community.
>>
> 
> Sounds like, "discuss personnel issues in private and only among impacted parties." Seems reasonable for 99% of cases. What's the recourse for the other 1%?
> 
> I decided look it up the words on Google because I haven't studied language. [1]
> 
> Based on the definition, the term "innuendo" seems to apply to the muted thread, as well as the term "equivocal."
> 
> This thread, on the other hand clears the uncertainty of the previous discussion, though obviously doesn't tell all sides.


Telling all sides wouldn't be a productive use of any developer's time

If you look at every organization with a Code of Conduct today, you will
see a text about their private reporting procedures.  Everything about
the CoC has to be private.  Until it isn't private any more, as this
example[1] clearly demonstrates.

The whole nature of the CoC and secret evidence is asking us to put
absolute trust in the CoC enforcers to be independent, unbiased,
competent and, if we are really lucky, they have time to actually meet
people on all sides, treat them as equals, review all evidence and make
good decisions.

The reality is very different.  Nobody is really independent.  If the
project leader is thinking about relationships with other large
projects, he may suffer from a subconscious bias and not look at the
facts about individual cases.

Suggesting that somebody violated the CoC, on the basis of secret
evidence, is itself an example of spreading innuendo.  You can't fight
fire with fire and you can't fight innuendo with innuendo.  Did anybody
here read Farenheit 451?  If you are in coronavirus lockdown right now,
I can highly recommend it.

This is where it becomes ridiculous: by relying on secret complaints
from somebody in Debian, Matt Miller is putting trust in innuendo to
make a declaration of innuendo.

Regards,

Daniel


1.
https://debian.community/google-influence-free-open-source-software-community-threats-sanctions-bullying/
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit_451
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux