>From a format perspective, please allow me to say "wow". This is great. My only suggestion would be to put a quick summary of the desired end state at the beginning in case I'm too lazy to read it all the way through. As for the substance, what I'd like to see explicitly mentioned is the benefit to Fedora. You talk about not having to constrain ourselves to the platform's release schedule, but I feel like there's one more step there. What will the decoupling of application and platform truly mean for someone who is using a Fedora deliverable? I ask this in part because I would want to pre-address concerns from the community, press, etc, that Fedora as an OS is dead. It's an uncharitable interpretation of your proposal, but I can see it coming up. My conversation with Adam Samalik last night clarified it some for me, but I feel like there's some assumed knowledge in this that I don't have. None of this is to say I'm in any way opposed to the proposal, I just don't quiiiiite get it, and I'd like to. Thanks, BC -- Ben Cotton Fedora Program Manager TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
