Re: [council] #58: Regional allocation for FY17 budget

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



#58: Regional allocation for FY17 budget
---------------------+--------------------
 Reporter:  mattdm   |       Owner:
   Status:  new      |    Priority:  major
Component:  General  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:           |
---------------------+--------------------

Comment (by mattdm):

 Replying to [comment:5 cwickert]:
 > Works for me and should work for EMEA. I cannot speak for the other
 regions though. I have some concerns about LATAM, they get less than they
 spent last year and due to bad tracking, this is already a subset of what
 they actually spent.

 That is true; LATAM definitely came out the lowest here by any measure.
 That's largely because their ''request'' was significantly lower than that
 from the other regions, which doesn't really seem like a good reason to
 penalize. Do you have a concrete alternate proposal?


 > > 2. Back to the regions, who will come up with quarterly splits
 > What's the timeframe for this?

 There was talk about it being four weeks. If we consider that spending in
 the last two weeks of a quarter needs to be budgeted and accounted for in
 the next quarter (see meeting log), that could mean two weeks after
 quarter start.

 Can you help me understand why this can't just be ''continuously'' kept up
 to date, though, making it just a matter of taking a snapshot?

 > > Additionally, after each quarterly budget report (see
 https://budget.fedoraproject.org/), any unspent funds will revert to the
 council and be reallocated. (To be used for centralized projects like
 FADs, or to cover special requests by the regions.)
 >
 > -1. Unlike the global/council budget, the regions already need to make
 cuts. If they can save money on event A in Q1, I see no reason why that
 should not use this money to spend the saved money on event B in Q2. In
 fact, they might only spend what that had initially planned, so I think
 it's unfair to take this money from them.

 The goal is to make sure that the budgeted funds are actually all spent
 (in meaningful ways, of course). It isn't to penalize the region for
 underspending. I'm okay with modifying the above to say that regions can
 do their own internal quarter-to-quarter reallocation of unspent money as
 long as it is reported up (and as long as it really does end up being made
 use of). But if the region ''doesn't'' have a solid plan, we do still have
 plenty of central needs (or possibly there's a strong unplanned need in
 another region).

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/58#comment:6>
council <https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and
open source software and content as a collaborative community.




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux