Re: strawman regional buget scenario

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Okay, so:
>
>          Last           Regional         Best Guess
>         Official          FY17           at Actual
>          Budget         Request         FY16 Spending⁵
>
> APAC     12650 (12.7%)   33025¹ (22.1%)     7600 (13.1%)
> EMEA     27000 (27.0%)   33250  (22.2%)    15000 (26.0%)
> LATAM    16500 (16.5%)   23180  (15.5%)    11000 (19.0%)
> NA       43850 (43.9%)   60000² (40.1%)    24200 (41.9%)
>
> total   100000³         149455⁴            57800
>
>   1. Based on totaling the wiki page
>   2. Wow
>   3. Remember, this year's budget excluded FADs, which is not something
>      we want to repeat; FADs were actually paid for from underspend
>   4. Yeah, that'd be nice....
>   5. This may not account for everything, but here's what we have from
>      internal records.
>
> So, as a semi-arbitrary starting point, if we average the percentages
> from each of the categories, that gives us:
>
> APAC:  17.3%
> EMEA:  24.5%
> LATAM: 16.5%
> NA:    41.7%
>
> If we give EMEA a 5 percentage-point "credit" for having a nice
> spreadsheet in early, that works out to:
>
> APAC:  15.6%
> EMEA:  29.5%
> LATAM: 14.9%
> NA:    40.0%
>
> If we allocate the $73500 in total regional funding, that looks like
> this (rounded slightly for prettiness):
>
>            Adjusted     Percent of   Percent of
>              FY17       Asked for   Recorded FY16
>           Allocation      Amount      Spending
>
> APAC:       $11500         34.8%        151.3%
> EMEA:       $21650         65.1%        144.3%
> LATAM:      $10950         47.2%         99.5%
> NA:         $29400         49.0%        121.5%
>
>
> Like I said, here's a starting point. What do you think?

To be clear, the numbers above are contingent on the regions
submitting an actual proposed budget with detailed plans for the
funds, correct?  I know that is a departure from previous years, but
given we want to start tracking our money more clearly, I would think
having those budgets and plans in place before funds are allocated
makes sense.

In other words, the dollar amounts above aren't going to be given even
if we all agree to them until all the regional budget information is
in place.

josh
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and
open source software and content as a collaborative community.




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux