Matthew Miller píše v Pá 06. 05. 2016 v 11:22 -0400: > Okay, so: > > Last Regional Best Guess > Official FY17 at Actual > Budget Request FY16 Spending⁵ > > APAC 12650 (12.7%) 33025¹ (22.1%) 7600 (13.1%) > EMEA 27000 (27.0%) 33250 (22.2%) 15000 (26.0%) > LATAM 16500 (16.5%) 23180 (15.5%) 11000 (19.0%) > NA 43850 (43.9%) 60000² (40.1%) 24200 (41.9%) > > total 100000³ 149455⁴ 57800 > > 1. Based on totaling the wiki page > 2. Wow > 3. Remember, this year's budget excluded FADs, which is not > something > we want to repeat; FADs were actually paid for from underspend > 4. Yeah, that'd be nice.... > 5. This may not account for everything, but here's what we have > from > internal records. > > So, as a semi-arbitrary starting point, if we average the percentages > from each of the categories, that gives us: > > APAC: 17.3% > EMEA: 24.5% > LATAM: 16.5% > NA: 41.7% > > If we give EMEA a 5 percentage-point "credit" for having a nice > spreadsheet in early, that works out to: > > APAC: 15.6% > EMEA: 29.5% > LATAM: 14.9% > NA: 40.0% > > If we allocate the $73500 in total regional funding, that looks like > this (rounded slightly for prettiness): > > Adjusted Percent of Percent of > FY17 Asked for Recorded FY16 > Allocation Amount Spending > > APAC: $11500 34.8% 151.3% > EMEA: $21650 65.1% 144.3% > LATAM: $10950 47.2% 99.5% > NA: $29400 49.0% 121.5% > > > Like I said, here's a starting point. What do you think? As someone who was involved in budgeting and helped set up processes we used in the last couple of years I like it a lot. Jiri
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
