On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Okay, so: > > Last Regional Best Guess > Official FY17 at Actual > Budget Request FY16 Spending⁵ > > APAC 12650 (12.7%) 33025¹ (22.1%) 7600 (13.1%) > EMEA 27000 (27.0%) 33250 (22.2%) 15000 (26.0%) > LATAM 16500 (16.5%) 23180 (15.5%) 11000 (19.0%) > NA 43850 (43.9%) 60000² (40.1%) 24200 (41.9%) > > total 100000³ 149455⁴ 57800 > > 1. Based on totaling the wiki page > 2. Wow > 3. Remember, this year's budget excluded FADs, which is not something > we want to repeat; FADs were actually paid for from underspend > 4. Yeah, that'd be nice.... > 5. This may not account for everything, but here's what we have from > internal records. > > So, as a semi-arbitrary starting point, if we average the percentages > from each of the categories, that gives us: > > APAC: 17.3% > EMEA: 24.5% > LATAM: 16.5% > NA: 41.7% > > If we give EMEA a 5 percentage-point "credit" for having a nice > spreadsheet in early, that works out to: > > APAC: 15.6% > EMEA: 29.5% > LATAM: 14.9% > NA: 40.0% > > If we allocate the $73500 in total regional funding, that looks like > this (rounded slightly for prettiness): > > Adjusted Percent of Percent of > FY17 Asked for Recorded FY16 > Allocation Amount Spending > > APAC: $11500 34.8% 151.3% > EMEA: $21650 65.1% 144.3% > LATAM: $10950 47.2% 99.5% > NA: $29400 49.0% 121.5% > > > Like I said, here's a starting point. What do you think? Being that I was involved heavily in the discussions around this, this I believe is quite even handed, and encourages pro-active reporting, while being as equitable to historical precedent as possible. I really feel confident that the council has done a good job supporting our central priorities while maximizing the amount of overall regional funding available. Bravo, I am very much +1 to this scenario, and I think this is very close to a 'best case' scenario with the big number that we have for this year. The challenge and priority for this FY17 budget cycle is to make sure we are gregariously tracking our spend, but also tracking anything that we 'would have spent' on if we had the budget for it, along with the projected impact of that spend. --RemyD. -- Remy DeCausemaker Fedora Community Lead & Council <decause@xxxxxxxxxx> https://whatcanidoforfedora.org _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
