On 28 April 2016 at 19:36, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/28/2016 05:20 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> On 04/28/2016 12:45 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >>>> 2) I like the idea, but an example project might help illustrate here. >>> >>> Agreed, though I have some of my own ideas. >>> >>>> 3) What are the criteria for "graduating"? Who are the mentors in this >>>> example? (Mentors are a key part of the incubator for Apache.) >>> >>> Do projects have to graduate? I don't want this to be viewed as a >>> competition between initiatives, and promotion/relegaion/graduation >>> seem to set a competitive tone. As soon as you start talking about >>> graduation or promotion, you start getting into resource allocation >>> issues, etc. >>> >>> I'd personally be fine if a project joined the incubator and stayed >>> there. If they wanted to somehow because an Objective, we already >>> have paths for that. >> >> I can think of at least one Atomic effort (the OSTree continuous >> integration) which might stay in Incubator permanently. >> >> Given that, are you sure you want to call it "Incubator"? That name >> does imply maturation at some point, even without the Apache precendent. >> >> What about "Fedora Innovator" or "Fedora Labs"? >> >> > > Tongue firmly planted in cheek: Fedora Bike Shop? > Shed? [Sorry I couldn't resist..] -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
