On 04/28/2016 11:02 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > I think we might benefit from having an official branding for > initiatives somewhere in between — work done *in* the project, but not > necessarily yet accepted into our "mainline". This would encourage > innovation _within_ Fedora without causing confusion over whether > something is "official". 1) would this create confusion with something like the Apache Incubator, which is well-defined but not well-understood outside Apache circles? 2) I like the idea, but an example project might help illustrate here. 3) What are the criteria for "graduating"? Who are the mentors in this example? (Mentors are a key part of the incubator for Apache.) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
