On 04/28/2016 05:20 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 04/28/2016 12:45 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > >>> 2) I like the idea, but an example project might help illustrate here. >> >> Agreed, though I have some of my own ideas. >> >>> 3) What are the criteria for "graduating"? Who are the mentors in this >>> example? (Mentors are a key part of the incubator for Apache.) >> >> Do projects have to graduate? I don't want this to be viewed as a >> competition between initiatives, and promotion/relegaion/graduation >> seem to set a competitive tone. As soon as you start talking about >> graduation or promotion, you start getting into resource allocation >> issues, etc. >> >> I'd personally be fine if a project joined the incubator and stayed >> there. If they wanted to somehow because an Objective, we already >> have paths for that. > > I can think of at least one Atomic effort (the OSTree continuous > integration) which might stay in Incubator permanently. > > Given that, are you sure you want to call it "Incubator"? That name > does imply maturation at some point, even without the Apache precendent. > > What about "Fedora Innovator" or "Fedora Labs"? > > Tongue firmly planted in cheek: Fedora Bike Shop?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
