On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Gabriele Trombini <g.trombini@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm really confused, Me too! > here [1] FOSCo was underway but till today I never heard anything > about their instances [2] since it's stuck (on March?). > In this page [3] wiki explain what FOSCo is and FAmSCo approved the > setting up. I think that's correct. > In the last months FAmSCo would have been terminated, but nothing > happened (as far as I know), so it went ahead doing basic things > just like being the Ambassadors point of reference (and even just this > justifies its existence). Which is great. I'm glad the work was continued. > Now Council takes care of budgeting (and that's ok), but what about > Ambassadors coordination? We know ambassadors are our front men and > leaving them going forward without a committee that is able to get in > touch with all the parts of the Project is harmful. There are dozens of > ambassadors around the world and we can't allow them to go without a > coordination. I agree. > Yes there's the ambassadors meetings but they are separated for each > region and I don't like they would not communicate anymore. Don't think > Council is able to do this as well. > > Finally, I can't believe that leaving every part of the Project (except > FESCo things) in the Council's hands would be useful and faster. Definitely not. The Council doesn't _want_ to handle this either. It actively wants FOSCo (or whatever) to exist as soon as possible. > So FAmSCo or FOSCo, but one of them must happen. Yes, absolutely. josh _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.
