Re: [board] #12: Fedora Council Charter Draft: collect concerns for revisions in preparation for vote

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:13:56PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > more weight to both the elected and merit-based representative positions.
> > Thanks for clarifying.  I see that the draft already mentions that there
> > is no benevolent dictator and is consensus driven but if there is no veto
> > power, would you mind explicitly stating that? Thanks
> I'll put it in the history section. In the new model, _all_ voting members
> can block -- effectively veto -- with a valid reason. The FPL does have the
> power to "unstick" things if consensus genuinely can't be reached and a
> decision needs to be made, but that's a very different tone.

Take a look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MatthewMiller/council-draft#History -- does
that cover it?

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
board-discuss mailing list
board-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/board-discuss





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux