----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> > To: advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 2:22:24 PM > Subject: Re: Don't blame LSB and standards, please: was: Re: Fedora Plasma Product, feedback please > > > On 04/01/2014 11:57 AM, Christian Schaller wrote: > > Well I think the real disagreement here is what the products is supposed to > > be > > about. The WG wants to create an integrated product that is clearly > > identifiable, > > not a 'mix your own' cookbook. We want to the Workstation to be as clearly > > identifiable > > and targetable a product as MacOSX is, while I think you want the > > workstation to be the > > equivalent of shipping a random desktop system on top of Darwin and still > > claim it is 'MacOSX'. > > > > Christian > > Which is equivalent of saying that the serverWG should tie them to a > single server role. No, the equivalent of that would be the Workstation saying we would only make available 1 application for the desktop. I don't follow the server closely, but last time I heard the plan was to make 'Cockpit' the main server interface across a range of different server roles. Christian _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
