Well I think the real disagreement here is what the products is supposed to be about. The WG wants to create an integrated product that is clearly identifiable, not a 'mix your own' cookbook. We want to the Workstation to be as clearly identifiable and targetable a product as MacOSX is, while I think you want the workstation to be the equivalent of shipping a random desktop system on top of Darwin and still claim it is 'MacOSX'. Christian ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> > To: advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 1:48:07 PM > Subject: Re: Don't blame LSB and standards, please: was: Re: Fedora Plasma Product, feedback please > > > On 04/01/2014 11:30 AM, Christian Schaller wrote: > > Sure, but considering that such a requirements list would include a lot > > of look and feel, behavior, system service usage, developer API > > availability > > and so on, it would in some cases require quite radical code changes in > > the > > respective desktops. > > You would need to be more specific why that would be necessary since so > far I dont know of any Gnome specific code that is available to provide > this functionality or why that would even be requirement for a > workstation product. > > JBG > _______________________________________________ > advisory-board mailing list > advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
