On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:25 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 06/13/2012 01:00 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >>> >>> Agreed. When I ran for FESCO, among my reasons for self-nominating >>> (other than having ideas about what FESCO should do and delusions that >>> I had contribution to make) was that the nominee pool was, at that >>> time, short of what was required to hold the election. >>> >>> And I got in. >> >> >> Here you claim you got automatically in because the nomination pool was to >> short >> >> >>> >>> And if I'm what you'd consider popular, I suggest taking a few steps >>> into the big blue room with the green carpet and having a look-see. >> >> >> You certainly are far from being on my popular list and I suggest next time >> you at least communicate with feature process owners before you start >> royally fucking up their work they have been working at for several release >> cycles! >> >> I'll probably have to be spending this and the next release cycle to clean >> up your mess ... > > There is absolutely no need for language and personal insults such as > this, it's completely inappropriate for any Fedora list. That said > it's also not the job of FESCo to interfere with anyone's features, > it's the job of FESCo to approve whether it's adhering to the general > technical direction of Fedora and that it's not contrary to other > features either already in Fedora or proposed. The whole idea of > having multiple people on the board and various committees is that it > is majority rules and a process of peer review. Clearly you don't > understand how it works otherwise you would have realised that and not > made the deeply regretful comments. To clarify, my actions referred to above were not done in a FESCO capacity, but as an interested ProvenPackager. I think that was understood, but I thought I'd point that out in case there's any confusion. -J > I think that if you feel so strongly maybe you should stand for > election next time to enact change as it's all too easy to criticise > when others actually pull their hand up to do the work. Having been on > the board for a year already I thought long and hard before standing > again because it's a non insignificant amount of time. The same goes > with the other roles. In the very least you could actually document a > propose changes for the others that are doing the work to review and > vote on. > > Regards, > Peter > _______________________________________________ > advisory-board mailing list > advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
