----- "inode0" <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:29 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 06/13/2012 12:12 PM, inode0 wrote: > >> > >> Wanting to give such a broad new power to the FPL seems utterly > bizarre to > >> me. > >> > > > > If I'm not mistaken he already wields that power + it's a fail safe > if we > > dont have enough nominees to fill up the seats for the governing > body being > > voted for. > > The FPL has appointment power only for 4 seats on the Board and in the > case when there might be open elected seats on the Board. So if only > two people had run for the Board this election the FPL would have > appointed the one empty elected seat. There is no FPL power to appoint > anyone to FESCo or to FAmSCo in any situation. > > FESCo and FAmSCo have different rules governing what they do in the > case of unfilled or otherwise open seats. > OK lets clear a few things up here. First Red Hat appoints the 4 seats on the board[1] not the FPL. Second the FPL does have this "broad power" already for the board[2]. -- Bob [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board#Introduction See the second paragraph. [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/SuccessionPlanning See the INSUFFICIENT NOMINATIONS section. _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
