On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:56 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Be aware though >> that the eligible voters are not the same for each governance body so >> this could be a little tricky. > > > Arguably eligible voters and nominees should always be the same for each > governance body as in anyone from within the community can run for anything > and vote on anything ( One thing I think should be fixed in the election > process ). That doesn't make any sense, really (though I think with the recent FESCo and FAMSCo changes, it might for now - I think everyone has moved to CLA+1) If you're not an Ambassador, for example, what concern is it of yours how that group is governed (though since FAMSco is managing budget these days, I think that's why they relaxed their eligibility requirement, though not being directly involved I can't say) or who does it? I admit that you could just not vote in that election if it's not of concern to you, however there's a process involved in becoming an Ambassador (for example, I'm picking on them because they most recently had the "only members of our group can vote" policy) and if you haven't completed that process, what say should you have in the governance of that group? (again, the criteria for FAMSCo elections have been relaxed, primarily because they *can* affect other groups in the project with monetary decisions). _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
