On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 20:01 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > You are reading a lot of emotional content into my statements that is > not meant to be there, and you seem to be reading my statements as > being that of the board. I am stating as myself what I thought the > events and arguments were and it is quite clear that I was wrong in > what was recorded. > > 1) If we said it was a 1 year term once the CWG was ratified, then it > is a 1 year term and any talk of disbandment, replacing, reforming etc > is out of place. > > 2) I am sorry that my memory is crap and I seem to have opened up > another crapstorm here. I won't be running for the board again and I > won't be asking to be appointed to it either. Sorry that my reply came off as seeming to blame you for my frustration with how the Board has handled this. That wasn't my intent. Again sorry, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
