Re: Discussion regarding Community Working Group and/or Ombudsman

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 17:17, Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:33 PM, inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I don't really think without a more clearly defined set of
>> responsibilities for such a group there can be much sensible
>> discussion of its composition. You mention a mediation role but I
>> could imagine the CWG taking on a broader function than just dispute
>> mediation. One of keeping an eye on the overall health of the
>> community and one of intervening in problem pockets before there is a
>> big fuss that escalates out of control. One of taking action to help
>> foster healthy communities as opposed to one of reacting to problems
>> after the fact. Something to think about in addition to dispute
>> mediation maybe?
>
> When the CWG was formed, it given a one year term with the initial
> goal of determining whether a COC/enforcement guidelines were needed,
> and then afterwards work on helping to maintain a friendly and
> welcoming community. Sadly, somewhere along line, the Board felt the
> CWG wasn't need any longer and started discussing disbanding it.

Hmm I do not remember a 1 year term being set.. mainly because there
were several people who complained that we "the board" were either
abrogating our duties by setting up yet another layer of bureaucracy
or that the CWG would become the Fedora Board's Secret Police. Most of
the concerns voiced after the enforcement policy was published were
the same.

Because of this my understanding that the CWG was to make
recommendations on what the COC/enforcement should be, and the board
would then work from there to charter the recommendations into the
final working body.

That said, if a 1 year term and ongoing moderation was in the charter
and I missed it.. I will happily reset.

> Regardless, it would have been nice to have been invited to these
> discussions, instead of finding out about them afterwards (which
> frankly, doesn't inspire much confidence in me about how they will
> handle COC enforcements in the future).
>
> Later,
> /B
> --
> Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
> BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
> _______________________________________________
> advisory-board mailing list
> advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux