On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Joerg Simon <jsimon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 11.01.2011 17:25, schrieb Jared K. Smith: >> In the rest of the tickets, we talk about the tickets in >> our meetings, and make no secret about what the tickets are related >> to. ÂAre there other problems you're trying to address with this >> proposal, other than the one I stated? > > i can only interpret - how does the board handle private discussions > with the owner of a proposal or a request who wantÂs to follow or coach > boards decission making process, or keep trac on something he brought to > the Board. > >> If so, let's discuss it here. >> Once we have a clear definition of the problem, then we can move on to >> research, ideation, etc. > > we also decided not to open the FAmSCo Trac Instance, because we came to > the conclusion that we can not expose private/personal information out > of our tickets > > But we made really good experiences to allow authenticated Users create > new tickets and let them follow up only their own tickets - no others. > should be > authenticated = TICKET_CREATE > authenticated = TICKET_VIEW_SELF > board     = TICKET_VIEW > ... > > i think this could be a good middle way. > This is done. I noticed one thing in testing it, though -- although any authenticated user can now open a ticket, it doesn't seem that the reporter can submit followup comments (they can only view replies). Joerg, do you know if there's one more acl that I'm missing to let people do that? Or could you confirm that the behaviour is the same with famsco's trac instance as well? -Toshio _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
