On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 1/12/11 3:38 PM, inode0 wrote: >> Just for a point of reference I have made a multi-boot CD using grub >> for years that is widely used where I work and I've not once received >> a report of it failing to boot any machine. While obviously the Fedora >> universe is larger than my universe I don't think grub is *that* >> fragile. I think in the old days stage2 of grub depended on emulating >> a floppy or hard drive which caused a lot of problems and that is no >> longer true (although there may still be problems of other sorts). > > Is this grub1 or grub2? I'm not claiming that grub2 is fragile, just > that it is untested in our universe. We don't really do costly > production and high profile handouts with something that is untested. grub1 John _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
