On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Jared K. Smith <jsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:43 PM, David Riches <david.r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> afaik, isolinux can do the same job that grub is currently doing, because >> its not attempting to chainload the isos. I'm happy to test it tomorrow >> though. > > Please try that -- I think that would make several of us more > comfortable, both from a "failure to boot" and an "easier to make look > good" perspective. Just for a point of reference I have made a multi-boot CD using grub for years that is widely used where I work and I've not once received a report of it failing to boot any machine. While obviously the Fedora universe is larger than my universe I don't think grub is *that* fragile. I think in the old days stage2 of grub depended on emulating a floppy or hard drive which caused a lot of problems and that is no longer true (although there may still be problems of other sorts). John _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
