On 1/12/11 3:38 PM, inode0 wrote: > Just for a point of reference I have made a multi-boot CD using grub > for years that is widely used where I work and I've not once received > a report of it failing to boot any machine. While obviously the Fedora > universe is larger than my universe I don't think grub is *that* > fragile. I think in the old days stage2 of grub depended on emulating > a floppy or hard drive which caused a lot of problems and that is no > longer true (although there may still be problems of other sorts). Is this grub1 or grub2? I'm not claiming that grub2 is fragile, just that it is untested in our universe. We don't really do costly production and high profile handouts with something that is untested. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
