On 12/16/2010 06:04 PM, MÃirÃn Duffy wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 17:03 +0000, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote: >> It's the Fedora Gnome Desktop Team that's being *accused for the lack of >> transparency and general communication to and with the Fedora community's. >> >> Being *upstream* is no excuse for not communicating to the project. > In this situation, this isn't quite fair to say, either: members of > Fedora's desktop team approached me in a public channel with the request > since I serve as the lead of the Fedora design team. If I was not a Red > Hat employee but I was the design team lead, I am confident they would > still have approached me to ask. > > As has been pointed out before, now is a reasonable time in the F15 > cycle to approach the design team and communicate the request - that is > exactly what was done in this case. > Hum I fail to see how relevant this is to how the Fedora Desktop Team has been publishing it's meeting, discuss what's happening and keep the community enlighten on what's happening and where things are heading and communication on the IRC and Mailing list etc. JBG _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
