On 12/16/2010 04:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 11:25 -0500, MÃirÃn Duffy wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 11:21 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: >>> I'd expect to see upstream development happening transparently on an >>> upstream list. Perhaps this is what we're looking for? >>> >>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list >>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list >> The team also has weekly office hours in Gimpnet IRC, are very active in >> public IRC during other hours, and in general are easy to get a hold of. > ...which are all *GNOME* processes, not Fedora processes (Gimpnet is the > GNOME IRC network, not the Fedora one). > Interesting to see how everyone is keeping awfully quite about what happened when the wormhole was created between the fedora-desktop channel on freenode and gimpnet and why they ( The other side ) wanted to close that wormhole. >> The designers have a public& advertised git repo for their design work. > Which, again, is a GNOME repo. > Exactly >> I don't think it's fair to accuse anyone working on GNOME 3 of a lack of >> transparency. Nobody is *accusing* upstream Gnome for a lack of transparency. It's the Fedora Gnome Desktop Team that's being *accused for the lack of transparency and general communication to and with the Fedora community's. Being *upstream* is no excuse for not communicating to the project. Fedora != Gnome ( atleast not at this point ) JBG _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
