On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 11:25 -0500, MÃirÃn Duffy wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 11:21 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > I'd expect to see upstream development happening transparently on an > > upstream list. Perhaps this is what we're looking for? > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list > > The team also has weekly office hours in Gimpnet IRC, are very active in > public IRC during other hours, and in general are easy to get a hold of. ...which are all *GNOME* processes, not Fedora processes (Gimpnet is the GNOME IRC network, not the Fedora one). > The designers have a public & advertised git repo for their design work. Which, again, is a GNOME repo. > I don't think it's fair to accuse anyone working on GNOME 3 of a lack of > transparency. It's not a lack of transparency, exactly - it's a location issue. There's much less differentation between upstream and Fedora for GNOME than for anything else. I was really just trying to note this for the discussion as it's an important thing to consider, not necessarily suggest that it's a problem; though it's something we should always take account of and be careful in case it *causes* problems, like some of those Christoph identified, and make sure we have things in place to avoid those problems happening in future. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
