Christoph Wickert (christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > It could be a great showcase if > * it would get the necessary support from all groups within the > project But again we go back to this... *this wasn't how Spins was set up to operate*! So, all that this leads to is: - People annoyed because they expected Spins to work that way, and are dissapointed that their requests aren't being handled the way they'd like - People annoyed because they're working with the way Spins was organized/intended, and are frustrated at being asked to adhere to an idea of it that wasn't there with resources they don't have. Obviously, there are two ways out of this: 1) Adjustment of expectations of those working in Spins to match the current reality 2) Board-decreed adjustment of Spins reality, and top-down directions to other groups to match that. Anything else seems pretty pointless. > * the board was not blocking tools that are on the wish list of > the spin for months. > > I think the fact that Jörg Simon was #1 in the recent board elections is > a clear message that the community appreciates his (our) work and should > reconsider their opinion on the Security spin (and spins in general). Given that he even said "I do not talk about spins" in his election platform, that's a bit of a stretch... I don't think that just because I got elected to FESCo that that means everyone should be testing my GnuCash packages. (Yes, I realize that's at a different scale.) Bill _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
