On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think we can keep in mind the 'do we prioritize some spins' discussion > here too. Requiring artwork group to create/help create artwork for > every spin there is (especially given that that set can theoretically be > arbitrarily large)? Not a good idea, no. :) Requiring artwork for, say, > four primary spins? More plausible. You may still think it's a bad idea > - I just wanted to point out that the possibility of prioritizing a > small subset of spins has implications here. Maybe we could decide to avoid re-doing the whole artwork at each release, at least for some items, so there is less work overall. -- Gianluca Sforna http://morefedora.blogspot.com http://identi.ca/giallu - http://twitter.com/giallu _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
