On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:12:29AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I do also agree with Jaroslav's distinction between different types of > spin; from my area of interest, desktop spins inherently benefit more > from the QA process because of what they do. The Electronics Lab spin, > for instance, doesn't present a vastly different appearance out of the > box than the Desktop spin - it's just a different selection of apps. Our > testing process mostly concerns itself with stuff like 'does it boot, do > basic operations work' which wouldn't actually differ much between the > Desktop spin and the Electronics Lab spin - but certainly *do* differ > between desktop and KDE, or desktop and LXDE. It would be difficult for > us to mess things up such that the desktop spin fundamentally 'works' > but the electronics lab spin doesn't, but we certainly can mess things > up such that the desktop spin works but the LXDE spin doesn't (we've > done it before). > Although, thinking of target audience for the spin, FEL could certainly benefit from a different kind of testing. Whereas the desktop spins need to boot and be able to yum update, FEL is one part demonstration as well -- so the programs that are being highlighted specially as being on the media should work out of the box as well. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpcPzt0aXrWP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
