Adam Williamson (awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > (Now, if we want each spin to fork off their own subproject, with their > > own rel-eng, their own QA, and maybe even their own SCM branches? > > That's more likely to scale.) > > This is the model I *really* want to avoid, because it defeats the whole > purpose of having a project. What I'd prefer to see is the model where > we have project-wide general groups, but SIGs contribute actual work. I'd prefer to see this model too; it's sort of what spins was originally conceived as. However, it was suggested in this thread that this isn't good enough for people (or just may not be working right), so I was trying to propose other options that I think would work better than the suggested 'have the project's resources split entirely across all spins, however many there are'. Bill _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
