Re: [Ambassadors] Red Hat's investments (was Re: Going passive)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bruno Wolff III (bruno@xxxxxxxx) said: 
> > 1. No swearing.  No exceptions.  (I look forward to the first time I get
> > kickbanned from the list for violating this one.)
> 
> I don't like that, but can live with it. But please clarify if that includes
> things like '%$&!' where people don't type a particular swear word, but
> indicate they are swearing and perhaps also cases where a particular
> swear is indicated, but not spelled out (e.g. f'ing).

Meh. I'm not sure what a zero-tolerance policy on swearing buys us - it's
orthogonal to actually behaving in a civil manner, IMO.

> > 4. The CWG needs a standard policy for violations.  Maybe something like
> > this:
> 
> We could use shunning. When people say things you (the general you, not you
> in particular) don't like, rather than start longs threads of name calling,
> you just stop responding to them.

If this worked, there wouldn't be internet trolls. Alas, 20 years of the
internet seems to put a damper on this idea working.

Bill
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux