On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:02:21 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg <greg.dekoenigsberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 1. No swearing. No exceptions. (I look forward to the first time I get > kickbanned from the list for violating this one.) I don't like that, but can live with it. But please clarify if that includes things like '%$&!' where people don't type a particular swear word, but indicate they are swearing and perhaps also cases where a particular swear is indicated, but not spelled out (e.g. f'ing). > 4. The CWG needs a standard policy for violations. Maybe something like > this: We could use shunning. When people say things you (the general you, not you in particular) don't like, rather than start longs threads of name calling, you just stop responding to them. > 5. Hold Redhatters and non-Redhatters alike responsible for their words. I > think there's a perception, fair or not, that Redhatters get away with > more. I'd expect that Red Hat employees would be more likely to behave because their employer has leverage over them and incentive to get its employees to behave to help the project. Anyway, I'd rather see language where 'Red Hat' doesn't appear at all in the enforcement guidelines. _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
