> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal Cool, will enlist there immediately, thanks! >> - Who ( jursitic/natural person) is the agreement offering party? > > Red Hat, as stated in the first paragraph, and as the original > distributor of Fedora. Ah, i see. Whats missing is the signature line at the end of the document. (?) eg.: Mr. Pop eye, Snake Oil Corp. Inc., Dallas, TX, USA, 2010 > There are appropriate references in the documentation for the > fedora-logos package (/usr/share/doc/fedora-logos-*/COPYING) which > contains all uses of the Fedora trademark in the product. Ah cool, very good. :) >> - Does it meet Fedoras license guidelines? >> --> Is it (free as in) freedom compatible? >> >> Can one dispute the board for releasing licenses/agreements against >> Fedora Projects core-beliefs/statutes/foundations? > > They aren't, Are not? What? (What is not what?) > [..] The Fedora Project, including the Board, whose > membership has included people from across the community over the > years, has always been not only dedicated to Fedora's core beliefs. We > also receive timely and effective legal counsel that helps us ensure > we meet (and hopefully exceed) our obligations to our contributors, > users, and the public at large in a way that fits our values. Thank you, I honor the board. > What is the goal you are trying to attain here? I am not accusing or fingerpointing here, If you feel so, please reread my writings carefully. I have serious and neutral questions about the situation arround freedom and how Fedora is run and ruled. If you feel them as unpleasant, I must excuse myself. Anyway, you are not forced to answer them at all. best wishes, Sascha _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
