> Fedora is distributed under the Fedora License Agreement: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/LicenseAgreement13 > which does have limitations on redistribution of trademarked items, > and follows US Export Control law, but does not otherwise limit > field of use. Oh wow, thank you Matt. I think I was looking for that piece of statement. How come I do not know about it but using Fedora since several years? Could it be I never had the chance to agree or disagree on it? Or do I automatically agree with it once I install and use Fedora without even knowing the existince of such statement/contract/agreement? ( Do we, as a project or RedHat as a company have to bring the evidence, that users agreed to those agreement? ) Maybe off-topic: The agreement says: "Copyright (C) 2010 Fedora Project." As far as I know from property law is, that only natural and juristical persons are ilegable to hold/own property. Fedora Project is no such person, nor holder/owner of the Trademark, thus this copyright claim is forceless. It should look like "Copyright (C) RedHat Inc." to put it in force. Of course, I am no lawyer. But given this is correct, RedHat as the "intellectual property" holder/owner, who did not state any USE allowance until today. Thus using Fedora today can be subject of uncertain contract relation (tolerated/illegal)? best wishes, Sascha -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / with kind regards, Sascha Thomas Spreitzer http://spreitzer.name/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sspreitzer Warum mache ich überhaupt dieses ganze OpenSource Zeugs? Lesen Sie hier, warum; http://de.windows7sins.org/ _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
