On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:52 PM, inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Really, I just asked a simple question. Does the Fedora Board > representing the Fedora Project have the wherewithal to declare a > particular image (I assumed an image not containing any Red Hat owned > marks) a freely licensed Fedora Project logo. I would think so. There are no trademarks involved in this scenario. However, getting such an image to 'stick' in people's minds, that's a different question. I doubt the cloverleaf means much outside of Fedora circles today. I'm pretty sure the Fedora logo itself means little outside of Linux circles - I've never had someone comment on my logo'd T-shirt or hat who didn't already know what it was. If we can't raise brand awareness for our primary trademark, can we really do so for a second freely-customizable image? Thanks, Matt _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
