On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:15 AM, inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Either way I'm not suggesting we shouldn't follow the advice of Red > Hat legal on this matter. I'm just a bit unclear about the boundary. > We seem to create under free licenses images that are intended to > represent the Fedora Project in various ways currently without to my > knowledge asking Red Hat legal to approve them. Is there something > about a "logo" that makes that process different? Let's be explicit. Give me two examples of existing image creation which you feel fall are meant to represent the Fedora Project that fall outside the existing trademark usage license language that covers the official wordmark and graphical logo? -jef _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
