Toshio Kuratomi said the following on 08/16/2010 07:06 PM Pacific Time: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:02:45PM -0400, Max Spevack wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> >>> Poelcat was asking for examples where the Board interfered with things >>> that were rightly in fesco's sphere of influence. >> >> This got me thinking: >> >> Let's forget the past for the moment, and worry about the present. How >> well articulated is FESCo's *current* spheres of influence? >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Engineering_Steering_Committee >> >> "FESCo handles the process of accepting new features, the acceptance of >> new packaging sponsors, Special Interest Groups (SIGs) and SIG >> Oversight, the packaging process, handling and enforcement of maintainer >> issues and other technical matters related to the distribution and its >> construction." >> >> How good is this description? >> > So... if we go with this... FESCo seems to fit poelcat's view that it's > middle management. FESCo isn't expected to be innovative here. They're > expected to take care that the routines of creating the distribution are > there and no wheels come off in the process. So how good is that This is not my view. This is not what I think. It isn't helpful to the discussion. John _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
