Toshio Kuratomi said the following on 08/13/2010 01:48 PM Pacific Time: > Notes: > * In the Max Spevack era, the Board was pushed away from making decisions > for two reasons: 1) FESCo was deemed to be the body that understood the > technical issues at hand and therefore the body that should make most of > the decisions regarding Fedora. 2) The Board was not all elected and > therefore didn't have as much of a "mandate from the people". In the Paul > Frields era, the Board started to make many more decisions. I don't think > that's necessarily a good thing as they've trampled all over reason #1 > above but being fully elected would help to alleviate reason #2. I don't recall things going down this way. Please name some concrete examples of this "trampling" so we can be discussing the same thing. John _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
