On 07/23/2010 01:53 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > 2010/7/23 Máirín Duffy<duffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> I'm clearly quite biased but I trust Red Hat a lot more than I trust >> Google, as Google has done several things to me personally to completely >> lose my trust while Red Hat goes out of its way to do things the right >> way. > I don't disagree with you. I'm biased too. But we can't build a policy > that encodes..bias. We have to build a policy that puts vendors on an > equal footing. We can still have meta arguments and make judgement > calls about choosing particular vendors based on track record. I > certainly don't intend to take intrastructure's or the board's power > to say we trust vendor X over vendor Y because a track record of > performance or unquantifiable on a case by case basis. > > But in the scope of this discussion about crafting policy we need to > treat all vendors..neutrally to be credible. Red Hat can't be thought > of as exceptional in the lens of policy on external service providers. > If anything we have to continually hold Red Hat to a more exacting > standard as a hedge against bias with the knowledge and the trust that > Red Hat is committed to meeting the standard of performance this > project puts forward. > +50. And I really like RH. And I understand that there are some technical reasons why Fedora is so intertwined with RH and that that's good in many cases. > -jef > _______________________________________________ > advisory-board mailing list > advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board -- - in your fear, speak only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
