On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 10:16 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > 2010/7/23 Máirín Duffy <duffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Is it a requirement that we do? > > No. If we want to decide to take a scorched earth policy.. then fine. > As a first step along the path of such a policy point me to a > publicly archived tarball of the current Red Hat bugzilla please. Are > we prepared to drop our dependency on Red Hat's bugzilla? If not, then > talk of a scorch earth policy is hypocritical. And as much as I love > to see us take a strong ideological stance, I don't want us to strike > that pose and then be hypocritical about how we choose to implement > it...selectively. > > I'd much rather see a workable policy in place, even if its a > compromise with my own idealogical stance as long as it provides what > this project needs in terms of a hedge against proprietary lock-in or > service degradation than a policy that encourages overt hypocritical > decision making and lots of special case grandfathering. What on Red Hat's BZ is closed-source? ~m _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
