Re: question for board members

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think that's OK.  We shouldn't be afraid to dump packages from the
> distro when the maintainer goes away.  If someone really wants them,
> someone will step up to contribute them.


Did we ever develop a probational maintainership path that would make
it easier for people who cared about orphaned packages to help with
the workload as a means to show right-action and and packaging
knowledge so they can gain full sponsorship?

Our sponsorship process is very focused on new package submission.
I'd really like an opportunity to work with a new contributor on
existing packages they care about so they could be given the ability
to do the work in our cvs and our bugzilla..but I stand up as
accountable for tagged builds for that package. Give them 6 months or
so working through me to prove to a sponsor review that they know what
they are doing..but let them do the work and make mistakes but in a
way that other people are confident won't impact users because I'm
trusted to review their work before releasing it into publicly
consumable trees.

-jef
-jef
_______________________________________________
advisory-board mailing list
advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux